Proliferation of Global Terrorism Essay

The Second Indochina war, popularly known as the Vietnam War, took place from 1965 to the 30th of April in 1975. It is a very memorable moment for the North Vietnamese armament for they have achieved victory, which is in fact, the first ever major defeat of the United States in the field of military. The defeat of the United States, even with their remarkable military munitions and superiority, created a place in the minds of historians, teachers, students and opposite people.As such, political activists, contemporary journalists, militant teachers and socially conscious generation of students are inspired by this event to fight back against the Vietnam War (Gilbert, 2000). These people or generation, especially those who are intimidated and did non hold onto the leftist political agenda, generally is destructive and utilizes violent protests. Subversive propagandas are also used by these people to voice out their angriness against the Vietnam War (Heineman, 1993). It would be g ood thing for these young people to give their supports in order to achieve a military victory, but ferocity is non the means or should not be considered as an option.It is unnecessary for violence would only provoke another wiz to occur. Violence would only occur and reoccur, from one side to the other, resulting to a vicious cycle something that is greatly unnecessary. It would be best if all the peaceful means would be exhausted first. If all fails, then we provoke consider violence as an option. But, as long as there are still other means, ways or options to take or consider, violence should not be considered. A healthy-thought action, not a reckless one, often results to greater achievements, if not the best.Part II Dangers on a Global surmount The Six-Day War which is commonly known as the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, is a major conflict that occurred between and fought by Syria, Egypt and Jordan, all which are Israel and Arab neighbors. In this war, soldiers or military forc es from other countries also joined the battle and helped the Arab forces, such as those from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Algeria and Kuwait. After the war, in 1967 where the Israel defeated the Arabs, the Palestinians who were displaced, tried to live in the places where they fled. The Palestinian population feared for their lives and treasured to live. They were also in affirm of calamity because of the strength of the troops and military forces from Israel. To run and conserve their lives was the best option that the Palestinians could do.The predominant Palestinian Population continue their lives in the West Bank. Almost 4,000 Palestinians stayed in the West Bank all of them are refugees or those who fled to save their lives. Some stayed, and tried to fight back with the swear of winning, and greatly showing these peoples Palestinian nationalism, but their efforts were futile.The predominant Palestinian population that fled, may have contributed to their cause for they ensured to sav e their lives the lives that would later on increase and ultimately create new Palestinian nationalists or future heroes of their people. Those who stayed and fought back may not have been totally successful, but they contributed as well in buying time for their people to run and survive.World PoliticsComplex InterdependenceCounter independence refers to the international relations. In circumstances, this affirms to the fortunes and inextricabilities of Robert Keohanes and Joseph Nyes ideas. These two theorists accepted that in the counter independence, the diverse and intricate connections and the interdependencies of the present states and the respective societies are increasing. On the other hand, while the complex interdependencies increase, the utilization of the state or societies military force decreases. Along with the decline of military usage, is the decrease of its force and power, which oftentimes becomes unbalanced though still important.There are leash characteristics of the complex interdependencies which were determined by the theorists. These characteristics would be necessary for analysis. The first characteristic is the multiple channels which connect societies and may also embarrass knowledgeable ties. The informal ties may occur between governmental elites and the nongovernmental elites. An example would communication of one government to the advanced industrial countries or non governmental elites meeting frequently.The second characteristics admit the agenda of the interstate relationships. These relationships include multiple issues which are generally not arranged. There is a link of the issues regarding prioritization and the objective of the third characteristic. An example may include the foreign affairs agenda wherein the relevant issues regarding the government and foreign policies are tackled.The third characteristic brings about the decrease in the dependence on the military force and power in dealing with the international relations. The government does not use its military capabilities to resolve issues towards other governments within the region when the complex mutualness prevails (Baaklini and Desfosses, 1997). An example would be the use of peaceful means or negotiations to resolve a conflict. Globalization and complex interdependence may be similar or would relate to one another in that an intricate relationship is formed or that there is an increase in the interconnections between people. In globalization, there is a need for advancement of the technology, transport and communication that would later on cause an economic, cultural or political junction, not unlike the complex interdependence which does not necessarily need any advancement in technology for a convergence may occur.ReferencesBaaklini, A. I., & Desfosses, H. (1997). Designs for Democratic Stability Studies in Viable Constitutionalism. Armonk, immature York M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Gilbert, M. J. (2000). Vietnam War on Campus Other Voices , More Distant Drums. Westport, Connecticut Greenwood Publishing Group Incorporated.Heineman, K. J. (1993). Campus Wars The Peace Movement at America State Universities in the Vietnam Era. New York New York University Press.